Comments

Log in with itch.io to leave a comment.

Viewing most recent comments 1 to 40 of 49 · Next page · Last page

Hi ! I have a newer laptop with 16GB memory but it only has Intel Iris graphics. It does have 8GB assigned to it but QualityScaler only allows me to use 2GB. I tried a little 30 min video but upscaling is taking 50 hours. Way too long… is there any way I can get to use all 8GB ? Would it be much faster? It is available as I have nothing else running. I find the program unusable for me at 50 hrs for 30 min… 

Hi my friend,

you can edit the GPU VRAM widget and select 8 GB, this does not work?

Sorry to ask but, are you sure the GPU has allocated 8GB? Usually mobile GPUs have 2GB assigned and in some cases you can change that value in the BIOS.

For the video upscale speed, you should try also to reduce "Input resolution %", this improve the upscale speed a lot at cost of quality.

Hi ! Yes I tried 8, 6 and 4 but only 2GB works but very slow. I would get a memory error as soon as upscaling started if I try more memory . I used dxdiag then display. It says Intel Iris XE Graphics Total memory 8166 MB,  Display Memory 128 MB and Shared Memory 8036 MB.  Was hoping to upscale the quality of older home videos otherwise not worth doing. Thanks

Hi my friend, 

if you open Task Manager on tab GPU, what does it says? 

Hi - Windows 11 by the way… GPU 80-90% (sometimes hits 100 but it varies), shared GPU memory 1.7/7.9 GB, GPU memory 1.7/7.9 GB 

(1 edit)

The AI upscaling will use only dedicated VRAM.

I think that your pc has only 2 GB dedicated to the GPU, you should check in the bios :)

Hi, is there anyway to make peoples faces more realistic as they often look unnatural?

Hi my friend, 

i think Interpolation option is the best way, you can try the 3 Interpolation levels :)

Hi!
I cannot make it work. I'm not a pro user and i already bought RealScaler. I need a refund. If i cannot make it work, is useless for me. Sorry :(

(1 edit)

Hi my friend, 

what is the problem? :)

You can also contact me on Telegram personally or on the group (https://linktr.ee/j3ngystudio)

Hi. Sorry. I could figured out, but i had to create an exception in Avast to make it work. It keeps sending the exe to Quarentine. It's really anoying.

I hope you can solve this in future updates. 

Hi my friend, sadly it is a known issue. 

I am trying to solve this issue for more than 6 months but maibe i found a solution thst will be in next release :)

You can try to deactivate Avast and then download the app, i can assure that is 100% secure and safe

Sorry for inconvenience.

hi, the exe file has been reported by VirusTotal as malware

32/ 72 is a big number. The code in github seems to not the whole source code.

 https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/70be40d2881959a7d1f8f9bce7567313d3f7a43b4470...

(1 edit)

Hi my friend, sadly it is a known problem of the library used to pack the code to .exe

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43777106/program-made-with-pyinstaller-now-s...

The code in github is all source code, just packed as .exe

I am also trying other tools to pack the project as exe, for example cxfreeze, nuitka etc, but VirusTotal still flag the app as virus...

thanks, it's much better now https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/e5611b74227e9a09d2ecd386865a13958020e894196b... (5/70). 

What did you do to improve it?


Hi my friend, very nice, thank you!

I changed how the app is built to .exe program.

I used to use pyinstaller before (https://pyinstaller.org/en/stable/) but precisely it gave many false positives.

So I studied another tool a bit, called nuitka (https://nuitka.net/), which does basically the same thing, but with fewer false positives.

Hi! just bought this software but with version 2.8 Avast antivirus still report it infected with Win64:Evo-gen [Trj].

I've seen the changelog on 2.7, it supposedly fixed it, is this still reporting the same issue or something else? as it make user worried to use the software.

(1 edit)

Hi my friend,

that s why i posted VirusTotal reports, to demostrate that the software is absolutely secure and the antivirus problem is just a false positive.

https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/9ed731f05f82fdd8bc2a6f10494ac9b86eac6583ec09...

Ah sorry I missed the link at the bottom of 2.7 changelog.
Hmm I checked the .exe file quarantined by Avast and here's the result:
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/b05a8934a0650325ad96aee43051ae54add804b7b4a3...

But just to be sure I marked the file for thorough analysis, hopefully it can cleared out for any suspiscion. Looking forward to play around with this one~

Hi my friend, thank you. 

I never tried to upload the .exe to Virustotal, anyway they are all false positive caused by the tool used to pack the app as .exe program.

The code is public on Github and is absolutely free from malwares :) 

https://github.com/Djdefrag/QualityScaler

The software is really easy and powerful.
ButI have 2 question on the Input resolution and the x4 AI model.

For what I understood the AI engine RealESR_x4 with an Input of 50%, shrink an HD video 1920 to 50% and then the AI engine upscale it to 4k video. But isn't better an Input of 100% and an RealESR_X2? Why there's no a x2 AI model? BSGANx2 is insanely slow on my old computer/gpu.

Thanks

Hi my friend, thank you :D

Yes, it should be better, unfortunately, most artificial intelligence researchers only make the _x4 models available, BSRGAN researchers are an exception and have also put the _x2 model.

Moreover, the _x4 model is often the best model in terms of final image quality.

BSRGAN uses an incredibly high quality AI at the expense of a very heavy architecture to run, so I recommend it only for short videos and images; for videos I highly recommend RealESR_Gx4 or RealSRx4_Anime which have decent quality but are much faster (4 to 6 times faster than BSRGANx4)

However I am actively working on improving the overall speed of the app :)

Is 2.7 the version you were talking about or is it an upcoming version?

(1 edit)

Definitely 2.6 is a big improvement. Much faster and I realise that in upscaling there will always be a compromise between speed and quality, but the quality is fairly good. Having tried the main premium upscalers where it could take days to finish a long video, this has a much more reasonable render time. I just hope that at some point it will be possible to make high quality upscaling in a reasonable amount of time.

(+2)

Hi my friend, thank you! :D

Actually, i'm waiting for to update the AI engine when new version will be available, from some beta test there will be 50% - 100% speed improvements :)

Wow!  that is a hell of an improvement! What about quality. As I said I know there is always a quality speed compromise?

Not this time my friend, 

i tested a 2x improvement on the best AI model, BSRGANx4 :D

(+1)

Well I can't wait to try it!

Is 2.7 the version you were talking about or is it an upcoming version?

Hi, no my friend.

For the new AI engine  you need to wait a little longer :(

My Malware never triggered for this program but its suddenly flagged as "Agent.Spyware.Stealer.DDS"  can you verify?

Hi my friend, 

yes, it is a know issue caused by a library used. In next release this issue will be resolved :)

(1 edit)

How long does it take for a 3 minute video using BRSGANx4 to finish processing?
Ps.: Ryzen 7 1800x + 32 GB RAM + GTX 1660

Hi my friend, 

it all depends by the resolution of the video.

for upscale video I would recommend RealESR_Gx4, which is very fast.

But if you start upscaling, the app will say the remaining time to finish the upscale.

Hello friend, the new version has a surprising performance, if you allow me to suggest next time you could add the option to remove audio from the video. For example, I remove the audio to make the conversion faster and then I synchronize it in a video editor.

Thank you my friend :D

Absolutely, I will add it as the next improvement

hi friend ,what is the best ai to use on hand written notes ?

Hi my friend, 

i will say BSRGAN_x4 that is the best  model in terms of image quality :)

Would it be possible to add the ability to use custom models?

Hi my friend, 

do you mean other AIs?

Yup.

The problem is that "is not that simple". 

To have a working AI, it is not enough to have the .pth file but it is necessary that from code you map exactly the structure of the AI model.

It is not something plug&paly that you find a model online and use it.

Ok.

but i am actually working to add new AI architectures

Great application. it got a great potential of growing up as its going the right direction. The UI may need some tweaks like a progress bar or something. But It doesnt really matter as much as the functionality is perfect. Keep it up!

Thank you so much my friend, I appreciate it. ❤️

(2 edits)

Hey just wanted let you know I am loving the update on your app :) especially with the explanation of each AI model. Thanks also for fixing the transparency issues with Windows 11.


By the way, can we no longer drag files into the program?

hi, thank you my friend ❤️

Sadly the new GUI does not support drag&drop, only file selection by button :(

Hi friend, did you remove the BSRGAN x2 model or is something wrong on my end? The 2x model produced much cleaner images than the 4x for me and had less tiling issues I guess due to needing less VRAM. But now all I see are the 4x for everything.

Hi my friend, yes, the BSRGANx2 has been removed due to incompatibility with newer versions of pytorch :(

but I am working to integrate a new AI architecture that is comparable in quality to BSRGAN but consumes less than half of VRAM :D

I see, that's unfortunate but thanks for clarifying. Is there any way to download an older version with the 2x model until it is released? And the new architecture sounds cool, I just hope there's a 2x version in the future because it's necessary for smaller images where 4x looks unrealistic.  Thank you!

Sadly i do not have older version prepared, and the old AI library is no more "downloadable" :(

Unfortunately, researchers on AI of this type only publish the x4 version of the trained models, because that tends to be the one that returns the best results.

hi, i am new to a lot of this and i am quite confused on how to use your scaler. I uploaded my image to it and clicked the upscale button.  I waited and now it said 'all files completed'. However, where can I access the upscaled image? I don't know where to find the enhanced image anywhere.

Hello, my friend, 

the upscaled image or video is in the same directory as the original file :)

does it replace it or does it make a new one?

because i am not seeing any change

nevermind i figured it out!

thank you my friend :)

Hi, i´m have this error with all videos:

---------------------------

Error

---------------------------

Upscale failed caused by:

'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xe1 in position 1774: invalid continuation byte

Please report the error on Github.com or Itch.io.

Thank you :)

---------------------------

Aceptar   

---------------------------

Hi my friend,

I think it might be about the special letters contained in video names, can you try renaming a video  "video" and try again? 

if you join the telegram group i can help you better :)

(1 edit) (+1)

Do you have any idea on how to fix the tiling issue? 
I upscaled a video today and see noticable tiling.


Settings: 

BSRGANx4, Full Precision, png, VRAM set to max of graphics card, 70% input res, 8 cores

Hardware: 

RTX2060 (6GB), i5-12600k, 32GB  RAM

Edit: Input Video Resolution is 640x480



Hi my friend, 

you can try to use half precision.

with 6Gb VRAM in Full precision it can only support max image 360x360 without tilling

while in Half precision it can upscale image or video 600x600 without tilling

:)

I see - But would that not indicate an issue with the tiling solution?

 Since you have that listed as a feature to "avoid VRAM limitation" I would think that this should be possible.

Half precision works fine but is way slower. 

btw: RealScaler can upscale the same video just fine. 

(+1)

I am actually working with this problem.

 It happens only with certain types of images and videos. 

RealScaler use 2 AIs optimized to be fast and memory friendly: RealESR_Gx4 and RealSRx4_Anime. 

With these 2 models and 6gb of ram you can upscale 1200x1200 images without using tilling.

Great tool, love it! I am already thinking about getting RealScaler and FluidFrames as well.

I seem to have an issue with the program window where it disapears into the background when I click anywhere but on the buttons or dropdowns.  Even resizing / moving the window does not work. The window behind the tool gets called into the foreground.


This seems to happen while the program is processing a video.

Not a big bug but would be nice to be able to move the window during longer processing times. 

Currently running QS 2.2.

Hi my friend,  thank you ❤️

Are you on Windows 11? because i noted that the "transparent effect" used for Windows 11 makes the window unclickable and not draggable, is that the case?

I cannot test this because on my machine i use Windows 10 where this transparent effect can't be applied, so any feedback is absolutely welcome :D

Yes indeed, I am running Windows 11. Sounds plausible.
Let me know if you need any tests done to fix this - I am glad to help! 

(+1)

Thank you my friend, next release will have this fix :D

Mind telling us what this is!?!



Hi my friend, it is a problem of the library used to transform the python code in .exe:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43777106/program-made-with-pyinstaller-now-s...

Hello friend,

I came to a little problem with the scaler... If the original was taken by phone, and not "widescreen" but the "standing video", the upscaled video will be transformed to a ratio as if it was taked wide screen... Resulting in turning the people into small, fat dwarves. Can be funny, but not the result it should be. :)

Hi my friend, 

I've tried several videos, even taken from cell phones, so tall and thin, and this problem never happened.

If you joined the telegram group i can help you better :)

I just bought and downloaded the app, but there there are only image output options for a video file I added. Where are the video output options?

Hi my friend, 

the output for video file is now fixed to mp4 because the library used to handle video reconstruction only supports mp4 format well. 

But I am already working on allowing the choice of format for videos as well :)

(+1)

Hi there,

Your tool here is a great tool ;) I'm using it a lot!
Two-three things, I may suggest:
- for the input resolution widget: I saw that you got a lot of questions about it in the comments below. An easy way to solve this would be to display the final resolution somewhere (maybe just under the input video on the top of the application) and that way we will know what resolution we will have afterward;
- you put here and on your github some examples for the BSRGANx4. Have you got anywhere some examples for the other AI Model? It's a bit hard to compare, for instance, the quality of each and which model is best for what situation. ie. is RealSR_jpgx4 better for real photos or manga pictures, etc.?
- is it possible to have some bench to know which AI model is the fastest (or to have clues about them)? For instance, for the exact same input video, and the exact same output resolution (ie. 480 to 1920), what would be the whole process duration for each AI model?

As I said, it's great tool. Thanks very much!

Hello, thank you very much my friend! :D

1. i am already thinking how to implement your suggestion

2. absolutely, as soon as possible I will upload an example with all AI on a single image

3. all implemented AIs use the same architecture, so in terms of speed they are identical. But I have in roadmap to implement other architectures both faster (but with lower quality) and slower (but with higher quality).

Thank you very much to you!

Thanks for your answers! I didn't know that all the model implemented were based on the same architecture ;)
I'll wait for your next update then :))

Thank you :D!

Really cool, thank you for your work.  Some suggestions:

Sometimes I'll be running a batch of images and it will randomly error when a background process uses too much GPU or something like that, and then I lose my place. What do you think of adding a "resume" button, or even better, a way to have it retry on its own so I don't have to watch it?

Also, it doesn't clean up the resized files of finished images after it errors. Maybe it will be better to remove the resize files after each image is done, rather than all at the end, to keep disk space free.

Looking forward to more from you!

Also, regarding the stitching, I think a more foolproof solution could be to include a small amount of "bleed" around the edges of each slice, and then to cut out the bleed when merging them back together. But, I don't know how this tech works or if that's even possible. Just pitching my idea. :) Thanks again.

(+1)

Hi! 

Thank you my friend :D

I will investigate this gpu memory problem; you are right about resized images when upscale fails, i will take this improvement :)

Thank you!

Суставы все еще там.

На самом деле, в этой программе не так много смысла, когда она оставляет такие артефакты.

Мой знакомый решил похожую проблему и выложил ее в общественное достояние.

Это класс для нарезки и сшивания контуров

https://github.com/iperov/DeepXTools/blob/master/DeepXTools/core/lib/image/Patch...

Hi my friend!

Thank you for the suggestion, i will try to integrate asap :D

Does anyone know how to fix this?

Hi my friend, 

maibe you clicked on Upscale button two times? because it seems that 2 upscale process are conflicting . Try to close the app and check on task manager if it is completely close, the retry :)

Hello, I have a problem with the image after rendering, it has the mark of the cuts, what can I do to prevent this from happening?

(2 edits)

Hi my friend,

This happens when the input image to AI Is too big for the selected value of VRAM limiter .

To resolve this issue you can use the Input Resolution widget, so you can downscale the image before passing to AI.

Another option is to modify Vram limiter option (default is 8 gb), if you have a GPU with more VRAM you can set the correct Number. For example if you have a GPU with 24Gb, you can enter 24 :)

(1 edit)

it always leaves a mark on the slices, I've tested it by lowering the input resolution by several %, my GPU has 2GB of dedicated memory and CPU 4, and I put these values in their proper fields, the resolution of my image is 1568x896, what do I do ?

The problem is your 2GB of VRAM.

You should imagine that for each GB of vram, you can contain max 100x100px, for example:

  • with 2 gb you can contain max 200x200px image
  • with 4 gb you can contain max 400x400px image
  • with 6 gb you can contain max 600x600px image
  • and so on...
this tool doesn't work for me if it leaves these crop marks, how do I contour this, or is there another tool that doesn't leave these crop marks?
(1 edit)

Qualityscaler there needs to be a trial version where it is full version for 14 days or you gt process 30 to 40 images and videos then it does not work any more.  If the program is up to my liking I would be willing to pay for it after I am able to test it out.  

is there an existence/possibility of an android port, I could only find windows apps, sorry if this has been posted already

Hi my friend,

Unfortunately, a smartphone version is not currently possible  :(

Thanks for the reply, is there a possibility to get a resize option (ex: 1920 x 1080) for images added to a future update if possible or if there is an avenue I can take to achieve this?

Hi my friend,

it is possible to do what you ask thanks to the "Input Resolution" widget.

For example:

  • if you have an image 960x540 (which is half of 1920x1080)
  1. you can select Input resolution 100% (that is, the AI will use the whole 960x540 image and feed it to the AI); selecting BSRGANx2 (which enlarges the image by a factor of 2), you will have: 960x540 -> input resolution 100% = 960x540 -> BSRGANx2 = 1920x1080
  2. or you can select Input resolution 50% (i.e., the AI will use half the 480x270 resolution and throw it to the AI); selecting BSRGANx4 (which magnifies the image by a factor of 4), you will have: 960x540 -> input resolution 100% = 480x270 -> BSRGANx4 = 1920x1080

It all depends on the original resolution of the image.

I am also thinking in the future to simplify these steps or give visual feedback of the final resolution based on the choices set :)

options button just doesn't work, and no clear indication for output location.

Hi my friend,

the "Option" button is just a header for the option list on the left bar, it will removed in next version :)

File output location is the same of the input file, for example if you load a file on Desktop, the upscaled file will be saved on Desktop but i will improve this part, thank you for the feedback :)

every time i run it, it gives bad parameter error: 

Error while upscaling

The parameter is incorrect.

Is there a more detailed log of the process anywhere? 

(1 edit)

Hi my friend,

The error that is on screen is the only error report. 

I have never seen this error, if possible could you please list:

  • The specifications of your PC?
  • What type of file did you upload?
  • What options did you choose on the left bar?

What is faster for video upscaling: bsrgan or esrgan?

Thanks,

Hi my friend,

are you talking about my 2 apps?

QualityScaler has 3 heavy, high quality models, while RealScaler has 2 models:

  • RealESRGAN_plus_x4, that is heavy, high quality model
  • RealESR_generalv3_x4, small and fast model, but with reduced quality

so, if you are interested in quality you should choose QualityScaler, while if you want speed you should choose RealScaler with RealESR_generalv3_x4

:)

Hi Jangy, I saw there is a folder "AI" to store ".pth model" so I tried to import a new one (found on https://upscale.wiki/wiki/Model_Database)  but unfortunately it was not enough for it to appear in the interface. Is there a way for me to import new model or not at all ? 

Hi my friend,

Unfortunately it's not that simple, each .pth needs all the architecture in the app code, but if you want to try you can change the name of the "newmodel.pth" to "BSRGANx4" and see if it works. At 99% Will not work :)

can you send me the link please

Hi my friend, what link?

the old beta version of software 

You can check Github, I don t have older version of the app, sorry :(

Hi Jangy, nice to see upcoming changes in QS.

what's the possibility of using a conventional upscaling algorithm (like Lanczos) and then running something like BSRGAN to fill in the gaps?

Hi my friend, and thank you :D

What do you mean, can you give me an example please ? :)

Well, you've got conventional upscaling algos like Lanczos and Bicubic.  There's some talk about how better results at upscaling could be produced by first upscaling 4x thru ESRGAN or BSRGAN and then downscaling 2x thru Lanczos, see: https://upscale.wiki/wiki/Model_Database

Not a video researcher so i'm not sure how if there's a possibility you could experiment with such a technique for future releases of QS

Ohh now i get it, 

Yes, this could be a great approach but the computational cost would be even greater than now :)

Oh def. would impose a greater processing time, I imagine you'd have to do even more with optimizations.  But it would make your app very unique: I dont know of anyone else doing it.

Thank you my friend :D

(2 edits)

any way to view location of upscale frames? just kind of says its working, would be nice to see where its at exactly. where to view temp files for the extracted frames? i dont want my main drive being filled up if it just goes by where the exe is installed. doing some testing on my 6900xt. also is there a way to enable multiGPU? i have a 1650 running as well for other stuff, would be nice to combine them.  

Hi my friend, you can see extracted frames and generated frames in a directory called QualityScaler_temp in the installation folder of the app, at the end of the process the app Will clean automatically temp files :)

(1 edit)

Just purchased and the app doesn't display the upscale button and won't let me adjust the window size. I adjusted my computer display setting so I could view the entire window and... the button at the bottom is indeed missing. Any help?

Hi my friend,

what resolution is your screen? Sadly the GUI used does not works properly on fullscreen, so i disabled it; and the app is made to worki with screens > 1080p.

However you can try to hidden the Windows taskbar, this can help.

I will improve this part of the app in next releases 

(1 edit)

I adjusted to 1080 and it worked! But now it gives me an error. I think it's because this computer doesn't have enough power to process.

Nice my friend! 

For Intel Iris gpus or integrated gpus you should input Vram Limiter GB option 1 or 2 Gb instead of 8 :)

You are correct. Thanks. My current old computer is too weak to handle this. I'll need to get a new one at some point. Thanks for your help.

Do not worry my friend, Is not your computer.

 It s the AI that Is really heavy but, even my PC struggles with my own apps haha. 

But they are future prof, when gpus will return ti be affordable as they was 3 years ago :)

can you send it to me please

Hi! I am getting this error:

The parameter is incorrect.

Can you help me?

(1 edit)

Hi my friend,

did you followed the README and installed Directx and Visual C Redistributable?

How much ram does your gpu have?  You can try to change "VRAM limiter GB" value according with your gpu capability 

:) 

Hello!
What I could try up to now, it is a very nice software, thank you.
But can it be that even just short movies take ages?
I have Pentium 13900 and Nvidia 4090, so I thought letting it do its job the whole night will finish a 9 Minute video.
Thank you in advance.

Hi my friend, thank you! :D

The upscale phase for video is really slow but with super pc like yours should definitely be fast. Did you check this options?

For example: 

* AI backend option. Did you selected the right gpu? you should have 2 gpus, one integrated in cpu and the Nvidia 4090

* VRAM limiter option. Did you select the correct amount of VRAM for your gpu? For the 4090 you should select 24 GB 

* CPU number optio. Did you select the correct amount of cpus? For example your cpu has 24 cores.

Also, for the new 10.0 version that will come in few weeks there are a LOT of bugfix and improvements for video upscaling in particular :)

Hello and thank you for the fast answer. Yes, I did as you said.

AI backend I have only one, the 4090 to chose from.

With the speed now it will still take at least one, I think two days to finish.

I maybe still use something wrong, because as you say, it should run a bit faster in my machine. Also I have 64 GB RAM, if this could be a brake of the process.

Hi my friend! Thank you :D

What is the resolution of the video you are processing?

If you open the Windows Task Manager can you check that your gpu is being used?

In my testing lately I have found that Windows 11 has slowdowns in reading and writing files, and as you can imagine this impacts QualityScaler's speed a lot. Do you have windows 10 or 11?


Thank you for your feedbacks :)

The resolution is 1424x944.

Taskmanager shows my GPU is in nearly 100% use. And I use Windows 11. So maybe Win11 is the reason then. :(

Absolutely super manageable resolution from your 4090; at this point I really think it's Windows 11 which is not yet fully optimized.

If you can try there is ReviOS, an optimized version of Windows 10 or 11.  free of Defender, Cortana and that kind of bloatware, updated ISO every month with patches :)

Hello to both of you! I love this tool. Especially upscaling very old pictures or short recordings. Unfortunately I experience similar habits upscaling mp4 vids. Using multiple computer setups (win10) while Version 9 maxed out CPU and GPU the newest Version 10 takes up 14 perc max.

(+1)

Hi my friend,

and thank you :)

Version 9.0 had a bug that allowed excessive cpu usage.

I'm working on improving QualityScaler more and more on the speed issue, but basically I can't do much for now because the 3 AIs of QualityScaler offer very good quality but have a very very complex and slow architecture.

For long videos I would recommend RealScaler, another upscale app of mine that uses Real-ESRGAN as the AI. In particular "RealESR_generalv3_x4" offers much faster speed (about 4 times faster than BSRGAN) at the expense of lower upscale quality.

Thank you :)

Hi,
unfortunately, I can't get the software to work properly; the Options button does not open any new menu, and whenever I try to upscale a file I get the error message in the screenshot below.
I get similar error messages with all the selectable models.
Could you please assist?
Thank you!

(1 edit)

Hi my friend, the Option button does not open anything, is just a "title" of the option under :)

That error means that the image does not fit in your VRAM limiter option. 

You have to select the correct number of VRAM limiter; for example if you have a gpu with 4GB of VRAM you have to select 4, if you have gpu with 6GB of VRAM you have to select 6, and so on.

What GPU do you have?  

UPDATE. I saw not from the screen that you have a integrated Intel Xe, in most case for integrated graphics 2GB Vram limiter is the perfect option :)

I hope i helped you :)

(2 edits)

1. What is the location of the temporary png files (and other temp files) . I would like to make sure that the application purges them after a task. 

2. Feature request: estimated time to finish counter.

Thank you.

Hi my friend, 

1. temporary files are in the installation directory 

2.thank you, I m working on It :)

Viewing most recent comments 1 to 40 of 49 · Next page · Last page